A Perfectly square waveform indicates to the user that the device accommodates sufficiently for the impedance of the closed circuit path. This includes the connection between the ECG pad and the patient, as well as the probe or needle and patient. If the shape of the waveform does not resemble a perfect square wave, it means that the impedance of the circuit is higher than what the device can accommodate for, resulting in less current (charge) being delivered than what the current (charge) setting indicates.
A circuit impedance which is too high is usually caused by an old or dry ECG electrode. Make sure that the ECG electrode is in good condition. Ensure that the patient’s skin is not excessively dry where the ECG electrode is connected.
When using the nerve mapping probe, it is possible that the probe – skin connection impedance is too high. Ensure that the skin is moist enough in the area where the nerve mapping is intended.
The impedance of a circuit element is defined as the ratio of the phasor voltage across the element to the phasor current through the element:
In other words, impedance is the frequency dependant resistance as presented by its real and imaginary components. In the human body different tissues have different impedance spectra and can be modeled by an equivalent circuit comprising resistive, capacitive and inductive components.
When considering different effects of electrical stimulation, equivalent models of electrode and tissue impedance can help to explain certain stimulation phenomena which may seem inconsistent to the clinician.
The figure below shows an equivalent model, demonstrating the different impedances to be considered when analyzing the electrode, gel, epidermis, and dermis
It should become clear that the total impedance path through which the electric field, generated between two electrodes, propagates is the complex result of the summation of the unique impedance spectra of various types of tissue. Each different stimulating pulse width, as well as its rise and fall times presents different frequency components which will result in different unique impedances.
It should be noted that, although there are many published values for chronaxie for various excitable tissues, the range of variability for a given tissue type is quite large. It is generally assumed, however, that nerves can be classified according to their chronaxie thresholds.
From the table below it would seem reasonable to deduce that the ideal pulse width to facilitate a motor nerve response (A alpha), would be around 100us. If one sets the nerve stimulator at 100us and increase the amplitude to 5mA giving a total charge of 500nC one would not get the same muscle response as if the setting is at 500us and 1mA, also giving a total Charge of 500nC. In the second case even though the total charge transferred to the nerve is the same, because of the chronaxie threshold of 100ms for the nerve, much of the energy transferred to the nerve after the 100ms is wasted on the nerve.
| Classification | Chronaxie | Sensory Functions |
| A (alpha) | 40-100us | Predominantly motor neurons they also have the following sensory functions: Proprioception, hair receptors, vibratory sensors, high discrimination touch |
| A (delta) | 150us | Deep pressure and touch, pricking pain, cold |
| C | 400us | Crude touch and pressure, tickle, aching pain, cold, warmth |
When one stimulates with a good current source, the shape and amplitude of your stimulus pulse will always be as selected, as long as the stimulator can deliver the voltage required to accommodate for the varying circuit impedance. All brands of stimulators are limited in the way they can accommodate varying impedances by their maximum voltage.
The figure above shows a typical current and voltage stimulation response. V (channel 2) is measured across the two electrodes connected to a subject’s body. I (channel 1) is measured over a 10ohm resistor connected in series with one of the electrodes. The maximum current as displayed in this picture is 5mA. The maximum voltage necessary to facilitate this is approximately 40V. Even though stimulation was done with a 5mA, 1ms square wave stimulus, the approximately 80us negative current component is indicative of the reactive impedance of the combined electrode, tissue impedance.
The figure above shows the stimulator at the same settings, however the impedance of the electrode/ epidermis interface was increased to a level where the device cannot supply enough voltage to facilitate the increased impedance.
It is clear that after approximately 140us the device could not deliver the required voltage. The current immediately dropped to around 4mA.
According to the discussion on chronaxie thresholds, though, it is quite likely thou that the second waveform will elicit a very similar response to the first waveform. This is due to the fact that the second waveform is ‘square’ for the first 140us while the chronaxie of the nerve is 100us. this means that the drop in current (charge) supplied after 140us would have a limited effect on the nerve due o the fact that it would’ve been ‘wasted’ in any case.
One approach to offering the user an indication of the expected net stimulus effect would be to average out the total current delivered. This would give the user the impression that the observed response was equivalent to a perfect square wave of 1ms pulse width and 3.7mA amplitude. However due to the discussion in the paragraph above, it should be noted that most of the neuromuscular stimulating response was most likely facilitated in the first 100us of the stimulus at 5mA. It could then be misleading to simply look at the average stimulating amplitude.
In other words it could be argued that the stimulation as indicated in in the first figure and the one in the second figure elicit a similar neuromuscular stimulating response (contraction) with the electrodes positioned at exactly the same distance from the target nerve. If one then relied on the information presented of an actual average current transferred, one would have the erroneous impression that the cathode in eliciting a response in the case of the second figure would be closer to the nerve than the cathode that elicited the same response in the case of the first figure.